page 141:
WAS:
1. \Tau <- {f_1,f_2,...,f_N} S <- 0
2. while \Tau is not empty, do
for s,t in \Tau with max{ov(s,t)} (s=t possible)
(a) if s is not equal to t, merge s and t to uvw
(b) if s = t remove s from \Tau; add s to S.
3. when \Tau is empty output T the concatenation of strings in S
1. \Tau <- {f_1,f_2,...,f_N}, S <- 0
2. while \Tau is not empty, do
for s,t in \Tau with max{ov(s,t)} (s=t possible)
IS :
1. \Tau <- {f_1,f_2,...,f_N} ; S <- 0
2. while \Tau is not empty, do
for s,t in \Tau with max{ov(s,t)} (s=t possible)
(a) if s is not equal to t, merge s and t to uvw
add uvw to \Tau
remove s,t from \Tau
(b) if s = t remove s from \Tau; add s to S.
3. when \Tau is empty output T the concatenation of strings in S
Correction by Steven Salzberg, 10/5/95.
page 144:
WAS: Overcap can be evaluated by an alignment score (See Chapter 9). . . . S(a,b) is the maximum score over all alignments of a and b.
IS: Overlap can be evaluated by an alignment score (See Chapter 9). . . . S(a,b) is the maximum score over all alignments of a and b, where |a| = n, |b| = m.
Correction by Steven Salzberg, 10/5/95.
Page 144
WAS:
$A(i,j) = \max\{S(a_k a_{k+1} \cdots b_l b_{l+1} \cdots b_j)$,
IS:
$A(i,j) = \max\{S(a_k a_{k+1} \cdots a_i, b_l b_{l+1} \cdots b_j)$,
Correction by Alessandro Rizzi, 10/10/96
Page 146:
Last line on the page
WAS:
(si = a)I + rj
IS:
(si = a) + rj
page 151:
Figure 7.8: Graphs H and G for ATGTGCCGCA
Correction by Steven Salzberg, 10/5/95
page 152:
To apply Theorem 7.5 to SBH data, we need to transform the SBH graph G in a simple way. To see the necessity for this, consider the case where a particular k-tuple is repeated twice (and no other k-tuple repeats exist). As the first repeat can be uniquely identified with s and the second with t, there is a unique Eulerian cycle. However, the cycle graph is
where two vertices with in(v) = out(v) = 2 are the repeated (k-1)-tuples, and the lower arc of C_2 represents the path between the k-tuple repeats.
Correction by Steven Salzberg, 10/5/95
page 154:
WAS: This is just the largest n such that the extention probability is small.
IS : This is just the largest n such that the extention probability is large.
Correction by Steven Salzberg, 10/5/95
page 155: (binary chip branching probability)
WAS: \cong 1 - ((1 - {1 \over {2^k 4}})^{n-k})^2 . . .
IS: \cong (1 - (1 - {1 \over {2^k 4}})^{n-k})^2 . . .
Correction by Paul Hardy, 20 February 1996
Previous Level
USC Computational Biology Home Page